Dear developers, is it possible to provide a Windows Installer for R.9.3.5? Since R.9.3.4, 1.5 years have passed and for sure a lot of work has been put into the new release. For me as a Tango beginner and mainly LV developer on Windows, this would be a great help.
We have a problem with appveyor that we have been using for a while to generate some simple Windows installers to install cppTango.
The produced artifacts/installers are only kept 1 month and now there is a limitation of 1024MB download per day/per project if I understood well (See appveyor artifact download limits (#907) · Issues · tango-controls / cppTango · GitLab ).
We had difficulties to download them and to attach them to a Gitlab release.
I just restarted the appveyor build corresponding to cppTango 9.3.6-rc1 (which is strictly equivalent to 9.3.5):
Direct link to appveyor: AppVeyor
You’ll need to find the artifacts there and hope you’ll not reach the 1024MB/day download limit.
Hello Reynald, thank you for the quick reply! Unfortunately, I didn’t receive a notification e-mail because I forgot to subscribe. Is it possible to set up the forum so that you receive automatic notifications for my own posts?
On appveoyr, I don’t quite understand how to download something. I clicked on various links and end up at Gitlab.
At Gitlab->Pipelines->Tags I see versions for Alpine and Debians but no Windows disrubation.
I spent some hours yesterday trying to build cpptango from source. This was a rather frustrating and unsuccessful experience due to my long ago C++ developer days, but I haven’t given up yet
It would be cool if the builds were automatically generated by GitLab. But as long as this is not the case, would it not be possible to add a VStudio project file to the repository?
If I may make one more wish: When I started playing with Tango + LV bindings about a month ago, I was able to install Tango V9.2.2 with all basic tools (jive, etc.) using an installer. But that’s from 2016… It would be nice to have something complete for a reasonably recent version?
this is probably a larger question for the governance group, but do we know what percentage of users are running on windows presently, and how many of those users could conceivably be equally served by a prebuilt vm?
Hello Amato,
From my beginner’s point of view, a VM is only useful for Tango Host Role and possibly for development and testing. But in the end we need at least a partial Tango installation on each lab PC. A VM would introduce there an additional abstraction layer and may cause problems with HW access e.g. to PCIe cards.